<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dems United Towards Health Care For All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.healthinsurancecolorado.net/blog1/2008/08/11/dems-united-towards-health-care-for-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.healthinsurancecolorado.net/blog1/2008/08/11/dems-united-towards-health-care-for-all/</link>
	<description>Research and discussion of the Colorado health insurance industry and the healthcare crisis in America.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:14:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian T. Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.healthinsurancecolorado.net/blog1/2008/08/11/dems-united-towards-health-care-for-all/comment-page-1/#comment-11308</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian T. Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthinsurancecolorado.net/blog1/?p=510#comment-11308</guid>
		<description>Truth-in-labeling would require describing the Democrat plan has mandatory politically-defined health insurance for all.  Or one might quibble that the insurance they want to force everyone to pay for is more like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cato-unbound.org/2007/01/08/arnold-kling/insulation-vs-insurance/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;prepaid health care&lt;/a&gt;.  In any case, they miss the distinction between health care and health insurance.  Having &quot;coverage&quot; does not guarantee receiving care, as shown in examples &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patientpowernow.org/2008/08/12/krugman-ignorant-liar/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. 

Politicians are masters of defining their policies by their alleged ends rather than their actual processes.  &quot;Public education&quot; is less accurate, and sounds better than &quot;Compulsory government-run schools.&quot;  &quot;Welfare&quot; sounds better than &quot;compulsory government-run charity.&quot;  The &quot;War on Drugs&quot; sounds better then &quot;prohibition&quot; or the &quot;war on drug users&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truth-in-labeling would require describing the Democrat plan has mandatory politically-defined health insurance for all.  Or one might quibble that the insurance they want to force everyone to pay for is more like <a href="http://www.cato-unbound.org/2007/01/08/arnold-kling/insulation-vs-insurance/" rel="nofollow">prepaid health care</a>.  In any case, they miss the distinction between health care and health insurance.  Having &#8220;coverage&#8221; does not guarantee receiving care, as shown in examples <a href="http://www.patientpowernow.org/2008/08/12/krugman-ignorant-liar/" rel="nofollow">here</a>. </p>
<p>Politicians are masters of defining their policies by their alleged ends rather than their actual processes.  &#8220;Public education&#8221; is less accurate, and sounds better than &#8220;Compulsory government-run schools.&#8221;  &#8220;Welfare&#8221; sounds better than &#8220;compulsory government-run charity.&#8221;  The &#8220;War on Drugs&#8221; sounds better then &#8220;prohibition&#8221; or the &#8220;war on drug users&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
