<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Issues Concern Debra Bartoshevich?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.healthinsurancecolorado.net/blog1/2008/08/28/what-issues-concern-debra-bartoshevich/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.healthinsurancecolorado.net/blog1/2008/08/28/what-issues-concern-debra-bartoshevich/</link>
	<description>Research and discussion of the Colorado health insurance industry and the healthcare crisis in America.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:34:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.healthinsurancecolorado.net/blog1/2008/08/28/what-issues-concern-debra-bartoshevich/comment-page-1/#comment-11462</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthinsurancecolorado.net/blog1/?p=561#comment-11462</guid>
		<description>Bob:
I&#039;ll let the comment stay because it speaks to a conspiracy hypothesis I have about that...
These campaigns (on both sides) are sophisticated, well-oiled machines. The messages you see coming from the ads and speeches are well thought out, researched and focus grouped. Should I really believe the McCain campaign is relying on someone who is just acting flaky? I&#039;m suspicious that this lady was part of a strategy conjured up well before the Wisconsin primary.  By then, Rush Limbaugh had &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rush_Limbaugh_Show#Operation_Chaos&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;operation chaos&lt;/a&gt; in high gear.  Republicans were showing up in large numbers to vote for Hillary Clinton and it was obvious the GOP was going to use the bitterness of Clinton supporters as a wedge to pick off democratic voters. I don&#039;t think it is &lt;i&gt;too&lt;/i&gt; crazy to think they also had people posing as democrats with the intent of becoming eventual &quot;Democratic delegates who support McCain.&quot;
Is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob:<br />
I&#8217;ll let the comment stay because it speaks to a conspiracy hypothesis I have about that&#8230;<br />
These campaigns (on both sides) are sophisticated, well-oiled machines. The messages you see coming from the ads and speeches are well thought out, researched and focus grouped. Should I really believe the McCain campaign is relying on someone who is just acting flaky? I&#8217;m suspicious that this lady was part of a strategy conjured up well before the Wisconsin primary.  By then, Rush Limbaugh had <a HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rush_Limbaugh_Show#Operation_Chaos" rel="nofollow">operation chaos</a> in high gear.  Republicans were showing up in large numbers to vote for Hillary Clinton and it was obvious the GOP was going to use the bitterness of Clinton supporters as a wedge to pick off democratic voters. I don&#8217;t think it is <i>too</i> crazy to think they also had people posing as democrats with the intent of becoming eventual &#8220;Democratic delegates who support McCain.&#8221;<br />
Is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Hossford</title>
		<link>http://www.healthinsurancecolorado.net/blog1/2008/08/28/what-issues-concern-debra-bartoshevich/comment-page-1/#comment-11460</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hossford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthinsurancecolorado.net/blog1/?p=561#comment-11460</guid>
		<description>The uninformed dumbass/bitter and spiteful vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The uninformed dumbass/bitter and spiteful vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
