<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Health Insurance Premiums And The Public Option</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.healthinsurancecolorado.net/blog1/2009/11/03/health-insurance-premiums-and-the-public-option/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.healthinsurancecolorado.net/blog1/2009/11/03/health-insurance-premiums-and-the-public-option/</link>
	<description>Research and discussion of the Colorado health insurance industry and the healthcare crisis in America.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:19:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Turbo</title>
		<link>http://www.healthinsurancecolorado.net/blog1/2009/11/03/health-insurance-premiums-and-the-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-14157</link>
		<dc:creator>Turbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthinsurancecolorado.net/blog1/?p=1414#comment-14157</guid>
		<description>Working at a doctors office (Family Practice) we deal with Medicare all the time. They are essentially a public option. Our profit margin from Medicare is similar to those from private insurance companies even though Medicare pays 20 to 40% less then the private insurers. The reason for similar profit margin is the low overhead associated with Medicare. They do not require referrals, authorizations, etc. Our nurses spend 40% of there day working on referrals and authorizations. Nurses are our single biggest expense past doctor&#039;s wages. Thats why we would be willing to accept lower reimbursement rates if the proposed public option is run similar to Medicare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Working at a doctors office (Family Practice) we deal with Medicare all the time. They are essentially a public option. Our profit margin from Medicare is similar to those from private insurance companies even though Medicare pays 20 to 40% less then the private insurers. The reason for similar profit margin is the low overhead associated with Medicare. They do not require referrals, authorizations, etc. Our nurses spend 40% of there day working on referrals and authorizations. Nurses are our single biggest expense past doctor&#8217;s wages. Thats why we would be willing to accept lower reimbursement rates if the proposed public option is run similar to Medicare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louise</title>
		<link>http://www.healthinsurancecolorado.net/blog1/2009/11/03/health-insurance-premiums-and-the-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-14145</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthinsurancecolorado.net/blog1/?p=1414#comment-14145</guid>
		<description>David, I think that&#039;s a possibility in an ideal world, but I&#039;m not holding my breath either.  The AMA and other hospital/physician lobby groups aren&#039;t going to quietly accept lower payments for services.  One area where I think we do have room to negotiate is with the pharmaceutical industry, which has been enjoying double digit profits (as a percentage of revenue) over the last several years.  So I&#039;m curious to see what prescription coverage (if any) would be contained in the public option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, I think that&#8217;s a possibility in an ideal world, but I&#8217;m not holding my breath either.  The AMA and other hospital/physician lobby groups aren&#8217;t going to quietly accept lower payments for services.  One area where I think we do have room to negotiate is with the pharmaceutical industry, which has been enjoying double digit profits (as a percentage of revenue) over the last several years.  So I&#8217;m curious to see what prescription coverage (if any) would be contained in the public option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David E. Williams of the Health Business Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.healthinsurancecolorado.net/blog1/2009/11/03/health-insurance-premiums-and-the-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-14144</link>
		<dc:creator>David E. Williams of the Health Business Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthinsurancecolorado.net/blog1/?p=1414#comment-14144</guid>
		<description>Thanks Louise. Businesses paying insurance premiums for their employees have plenty to worry about and I feel for them!

It seems to me there&#039;s some chance a public option could actually help control costs for businesses by pushing down the market price of physician and hospital services, but I&#039;m not holding my breath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Louise. Businesses paying insurance premiums for their employees have plenty to worry about and I feel for them!</p>
<p>It seems to me there&#8217;s some chance a public option could actually help control costs for businesses by pushing down the market price of physician and hospital services, but I&#8217;m not holding my breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
